The second day focused on issues related to informing participants in health research projects conducted in LMICs.
The reality in many of these contexts is that a significant proportion of adults remain illiterate — nearly half in Côte d’Ivoire, with stark regional disparities and decentralized areas where the vast majority of adults are unable to read or write. In such settings, ensuring truly informed consent is a major ethical challenge. Feedback from the field also revealed that, in some studies, up to 50% of participants were unaware they had been enrolled in a clinical trial.
Towards new approaches to participant information
In response to these findings, alternative educational tools previously used in research projects were presented and served as a basis for discussion. However, several questions remain: Are these formats perceived as appropriate by adult participants? Can they be validated within existing regulatory frameworks? Evaluating these new tools is now absolutely essential.
Several concrete approaches were discussed:
-
An explanatory comic strip was developed to help participants better understand the objectives and implications of research;
-
Development of multilingual video clips;
-
Creation of image banks to illustrate information sheets;
-
Enhanced training for research teams on ethical communication;
-
Use of impartial witnesses, particularly in cases of illiteracy.
The essential role of patient associations in participant information
The crucial role of patient associations and civil society representatives in the information process was unanimously reaffirmed. Their involvement from the earliest stages of project co-design helps ensure that educational tools are more accessible and socially acceptable. These groups also act as key intermediaries with communities, fostering trust and transparency in clinical research.